Probably. The term is too politicized, as the WSJ Style and Substance blog explains.
Like Taxgirl (see below) Style and Substance is a blog we probably should consult more often. The author, Paul Martin, clearly cares about well-worded, properly-arranged writing.
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Posts
Posts
Click the cover for more info.
Notes for trust officers, private bankers and others concerned with estate and trust planning, from a Merrill Anderson Senior Editor and his retired mentor.
Copyright 2005-2022 M.A. Co. Powered by Blogger.
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Now available: Our monthly Trust & Investment Newsletter
Click the cover for more info.
For direct inquiries:
Labels
- Investing (196)
- estate tax (148)
- income tax (114)
- estate planning (108)
- wills (104)
- trust ads (94)
- investment management (68)
- nest eggs (58)
- art (55)
- hedge funds (45)
- Madoff (43)
- trusts (41)
- Astor (39)
- wealth (39)
- retirement (37)
- stock market (37)
- brokers (31)
- inheritance (27)
- endowments (26)
- fiduciaries (22)
- Ponzi (21)
- executors (20)
- millionaires (19)
- philanthropy (19)
- gift tax (18)
- Apple (17)
- Wall Street (16)
- collectibles (16)
- alternative investments (15)
- dynasty trusts (15)
- estates (15)
- Helmsley (14)
- living trusts (14)
- brokerage (13)
- Bayou (12)
- investment performance (11)
Search Trust and Wealth Management Marketing
Blog Archive
-
▼
2009
(415)
-
▼
December
(30)
- David Levine (1926-2009)
- 15 per day, every day
- Estate Tax Mystery Solved?
- When the Going Gets Tough . . .
- Bad tax ideas
- Thinking Hard About Retirement and Death
- Double Your Money in 6,932 Years!
- A YouTube "Christmas Special"
- Season’s Greetings!
- Upping the ante
- “Grand Theft Astor:” The Sentence
- Fun and Death Taxes
- An Indispensable Little Folder
- Estate tax to lapse as legislated
- Can Estates Be Taxed Retroactively?
- Thinking the unthinkable
- Congress Conceives the Temporary Fiduciary
- I wish they had mentioned this earlier
- Estate tax safety net
- A game of chicken over the federal estate tax
- Should the WSJ Have Banned "Death Tax"?
- Why Estate Settlement Shouldn't Be Casual
- The Astor Update
- Let's Hear It for “Old Money”
- Straw in the wind?
- "Funny, You Don't Look Rich"
- One small step for permanent estate tax reform
- Does “2KX” Have Legs?
- Lights, Camera . . . Last Words
- “Trust Service” or “Trustee Service”?
-
▼
December
(30)
Senior GO TO Guide • BLOG
Popular Posts
-
During the middle third of the Twentieth Century, at this time of year Coca Cola virtually appropriated Santa Claus. This ad, from 1963, fea... -
Cyber Monday! You just bought a huge, name brand LED TV for $999! Would you have paid $1,130? Would you have been happier to pay $1,130 if...
-
Fifty years ago Norman Dacey, a Connecticut financial planner, shook the estate planning world by publishing How to Avoid Probate . Livin... -
Baylor scores high for endowment returns, according to the Wall Street Journal . But why are these multibillion dollar funds tax free, and m...
-
Researchers at Berkeley find that the rich don't like eye contact. Why so snooty? Robert Frank in The Wealth Report offers a plausible ...
2 comments:
you have a nice site. thanks for sharing this resources. keep it up. anyway, various kinds of ebooks are available here
http://feboook.blogspot.com
I don't get it. The WSJ style book does not give an alternative umbrella term to use to cover both inheritance and estate taxes.
What's more, the term "death taxes" was invented by Congress, not political consultants, and has appeared prominently in the tax code for decades, as the "credit for state death taxes."
No, they should not have banned the term.
Post a Comment