Over the last 50 years, according to a Democrat promo making the Internet rounds, stocks averaged an 11% annualized return when a Democrat occupied the White House. And when a Republican sat in the Oval Office? Less than 3%.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e20a0/e20a029733e91f63128bb118cd8d7b499273d9c6" alt=""
Democrat Commanders in Chief do go
hand in hand with better stock returns.
Here we linked to a 2008 NY Times comparison going back to 1929. The performance gap is pronounced. Even so, "hand in hand" isn't necessarily the same as
cause and effect.
Because the Republicans retain a reputation as the party of fat-cat billionaires, the gap in stock market returns is counter-intuitive. Which may explain why some investors don't believe it.
Current example,
this Well Fargo survey of investors: Only 15% believed a Democrat in the White House would be better for the stock market. Twice as many thought they would profit more from a Republican.
No comments:
Post a Comment