Showing posts with label Merrill Lynch. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Merrill Lynch. Show all posts

Thursday, October 24, 2019

Dubious Decanting of Grandchildren's Trusts

A potential advantage of decanting, where authorized by state law, is that it may permit a trustee to modify a trust without the consent of the grantor and the beneficiaries or the time, expense, uncertainty, and publicity associated with obtaining court approval of the modification.
          – Michael J. Skeary, "The Power of Trust Decanting"
A wealthy grandmother celebrated the birth of her grandchildren by funding a generation-skipping trust for each new arrival. She served as trustee, with Merrill Lynch as custodian.

When grandmother resigned as trustee because of age, the children's father took over. Decades later, when the grandchildren learned they were old enough to draw upon their trust funds, they found their mother had been named co-trustee. And, according to the childrens' lawsuit, she had moved trust assets into a new trust that entitled her “to all net income and as much principal from the trust property as the trustee determines is necessary.”

For other wealthy grandparents the moral is obvious: Naming a reputable bank or trust company is  worth the trustee fees.

Sunday, May 11, 2014

1969: More Ads from the Mad Men Era

In the spring of 1969 Merrill Lynch joined the rush to promote hot new go-go stocks:
It used to be that practically all you needed to sniff out a growth stock was a good nose for technology. Xerox smelled good to some people. Polaroid smelled good to others. And sure enough, both rose higher than a soufflé at Pavillon.
Young and small was the way to go, Merrill Lynch figured, because "we wanted companies that could show dramatic gains in earnings. That’s a lot easier for Davids than for Goliaths."

Alas, go-go shares were about to collapse. Investors soon decided the only trustworthy stocks were the Goliaths, the Nifty Fifty.


US Trust must have sensed market uncertainty, for it reran one of its classic ads. Could any headline be more timeless?


Instead of spotlighting an affluent adult as usual, this Chemical ad features a kid. In current dollars the lucky lad's trust is worth way over $1 million. Would an ad calling attention to that much youthful good fortune prove problematic today?