data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70a99/70a99c923c7ce19f71be0b6b5d6b021af48c8dc2" alt=""
We had little in the way of investment losses to offset the gain (remember those days?). Still, the federal income tax on long-term gain is no more than 15%. Could be worse.
It was worse. At tax time we discovered that, except for people with exceptionally large incomes, long-term gain is not truly exempt from the Alternative Minimum Tax. The result, as explained here, was to boost the tax on our Apple gain to around 22%.
Oh, well. It could have been worse.
And it is. As senior citizens, my wife and I recently received polite notes from a Social Security computer, announcing a boost in our retirement benefits to offset inflation, negated by a significant cut in the benefits we would actually receive in 2009.
The cut results from a surcharge – the SS computer calls it "an income-related monthly adjustment amount" – on the premium we pay for Medicare Part B. The surcharge is based on MAGI:
We ask the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) for your tax [sic] income. We then add your adjusted gross income together with your tax-exempt interest income to get an amount that we call modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) . . . .Thanks to the humongous capital gain, our MAGI results in surcharges for 2009 equal to another two-percent tax on the gain. That brings the overall tax rate to 24%.
MAGI may include one-time only income, such as capital gains . . . . One-time income will effect your Medicare Part B premium for only one year.
During the election campaign, weren't the Democrats talking about a 20% capital-gains tax? Sounds good to me!
2 comments:
Glad to had the sense to jump out at the top last year. Better a 24% tax than a 50% loss, no?
On the other hand, Paine Webber still sees the stock going back to $235.
I didn't say I sold all our Apple shares. Perish the thought!
Post a Comment