1958
$125
2005
$10,000
2013
$80,000,000
2014
$127,500,000
2017
$450,000,000
skip to main |
skip to sidebar
Posts
Posts
Click the cover for more info.
Notes for trust officers, private bankers and others concerned with estate and trust planning, from a Merrill Anderson Senior Editor and his retired mentor.
Copyright 2005-2022 M.A. Co. Powered by Blogger.
Subscribe To
Posts
Posts
Now available: Our monthly Trust & Investment Newsletter
Click the cover for more info.
For direct inquiries:
Labels
- Investing (196)
- estate tax (148)
- income tax (114)
- estate planning (108)
- wills (104)
- trust ads (94)
- investment management (68)
- nest eggs (58)
- art (55)
- hedge funds (45)
- Madoff (43)
- trusts (41)
- Astor (39)
- wealth (39)
- retirement (37)
- stock market (37)
- brokers (31)
- inheritance (27)
- endowments (26)
- fiduciaries (22)
- Ponzi (21)
- executors (20)
- millionaires (19)
- philanthropy (19)
- gift tax (18)
- Apple (17)
- Wall Street (16)
- collectibles (16)
- alternative investments (15)
- dynasty trusts (15)
- estates (15)
- Helmsley (14)
- living trusts (14)
- brokerage (13)
- Bayou (12)
- investment performance (11)
Search Trust and Wealth Management Marketing
Blog Archive
-
▼
2017
(82)
-
▼
November
(14)
- Inheritance REDUCES Inequality?
- Death Taxes on Life Support
- Happy Thanksgiving
- The Ivies push back
- The Incredible Shrinking Stock Market
- Art Appreciation
- Harvard Will Invest the Yale Way
- Fun and Taxes
- This Year 50 to 80 Family Farms or Businesses Face...
- If It Smells Like a Tulip . . .
- The Agonies of Wealth
- $300 million per year
- I don't like tax bubbles
- Why I support the tax reform bill
-
▼
November
(14)
Senior GO TO Guide • BLOG
Popular Posts
-
During the middle third of the Twentieth Century, at this time of year Coca Cola virtually appropriated Santa Claus. This ad, from 1963, fea... -
Fifty years ago Norman Dacey, a Connecticut financial planner, shook the estate planning world by publishing How to Avoid Probate . Livin... -
Cyber Monday! You just bought a huge, name brand LED TV for $999! Would you have paid $1,130? Would you have been happier to pay $1,130 if...
-
Baylor scores high for endowment returns, according to the Wall Street Journal . But why are these multibillion dollar funds tax free, and m...
-
Researchers at Berkeley find that the rich don't like eye contact. Why so snooty? Robert Frank in The Wealth Report offers a plausible ...
2 comments:
Love your "considered to be" language. So true.
This does not strike be as high quality art. Rather, it is $10,000 worth of art and $449,990,000 worth of provenance.
Attaching such a disproportionate value to provenance is a strong indicator of irrationality.
Art Bubble! Bitcoin bubble! Where will it all end?
Post a Comment